Thinking It Through December 13, 2011
Posted by lizp4 in Uncategorized.trackback
New news out there on the environmental front: (I mean, besides the fact that anthropogenic global warming has been proven to be a hoax, thanks to the second “dump” of incriminating emails.) The UN now asserts that women face the heaviest consequences from global warming, especially if they go about their daily chores in mountainous regions of the undeveloped world.
You have to ask yourself why this might be. It only took me a couple of seconds to think it through, and I came up with answers immediately, and they are these:
1) In using women of mountainous regions as their examples, the envirowhacko PTB are selecting a sample population that would create the most difficulty in proving or disproving their assumptions. Mountainous regions of undeveloped countries are notoriously hard to get to, difficult to navigate, extremely expensive to get to, and require large amounts of specialized gear for foreigners in order for them to just survive, let alone be anywhere near comfortable in rocky, high-altitude areas.
2) Women in these regions are easy targets for environmental propaganda because in most third world countries, they are the least educated part of the populations, and the easiest to lie to, do the majority of the chores involved with survival, and spend the most time finding and preparing food, keeping their families warm and clothed.
By choosing this demographic as their model, the envirowhackos virtually guarantee that nobody sane will be going into these areas to check out the factuality of the assertions, which is why the grouping was chosen in the first place. Never underestimate the cunning and underhandedness of the world’s environmental activists. They will do anything, say anything, assert the wildest lies (anthropogenic global warming, for instance) to keep the grant monies rolling in.
The problem now is getting the word out. How many mainstream news outlets have mentioned even a hint about the most recent dump of more than 5,300 emails? It included messages that incontrovertibly prove the collusion, conspiracy, and twisting of the data used to “prove” man-caused global warming (now called “climate change,” because they know their lies have caught up with them). For example, I had a dickens of a time even finding THIS much information on the emails. How about this, as well?? Heard a lot about this? Outside of Rush Limbaugh, I haven’t heard a soul mention it.
And here we sit, ready within the next month to allow ourselves to be FORCED to use curly lightbulbs for the sake of a proven worldwide hoax.
If you apply a little logic, you see its a pretty weak argument. Women living in mountainous regious probably put more effort into dealing with the harsh climate at higher altitude. Now, if it were to warm up (not that its going to any time soon) wouldn’t their lives be easier? Just sayin’.
Heh. Well said. High altitude survival is a problem for everyone who lives there, but I’m sure women were chosen because we feel more “sympathy” for mothers and grandmothers. Lowest common denominator.