The Truth, the title of the severly tacky and blasphemous painting of an apparently Disco-dancing current resident, done to celebrate the first 100 Days of Infamy, has been laughed at, excoriated, critiqued, and denounced (by me, for one), but it is interesting, nevertheless.
Calling such a piece of kitschy corn “The Truth” is presumptuous and pompous in the first place, if for no other reason than that I find myself sorely tempted to just fall out of my chair laughing at the very idea of it. The REAL Truth, the Real One, who backed up His claim by dying and rising, is not depicted in this painting, no matter what anybody tells you to the contrary. The person in that painting is NOT the truth.
There are a couple of ways we can look at this. We can see the image and be offended to our shoe-soles, and that is a good response, given the blatant blasphemy it portrays. But there is also another side to this. It could be possible that the artist is being cynically sarcastic in depicting the current resident — a known prevaricator — in such a pose, perhaps trying to convey the thought that the truth has been put to death by the predatory politics of the administration. Riiiiiiiiight….
The whole thing literally screams out for some theological discourse, and because of the subject, it’s hard NOT to take that tack. Besides, I believe the artist (and I call him that, because the piece shows a fair amount of technical artistic ability) really meant to portray — through the rather obvious device of the crown of thorns — the subject as a “new” messiah, one who can now supplant the Real Messiah and give our morals, consciences, and sensibilities a rest, since there is a new kid in town who won’t be making us feel guilty about things we only do in the bathroom with the blind pulled down or in the sleazy bath house stall.
But, the creepy thing about this is that there is a whole segment of the American population who takes the painting for what it is intended for: A new object of worship. If I wasn’t so cynical, I think I’d be downright frightened by what this brings to mind. I believe in a mighty, just, and jealous God Who has the right to do what He wants with us because we are His creatures. Truly, “God is not mocked,” but He is also not fooled, and I don’t think He suffers blasphemers easily. The artist might come in for a certain amount of responsibility for his part in the travesty, but the subject of the painting is going to have to be responsible for denying that it is really himself who is depicted there and not a fictional “other.” His choice is simple, but it IS his choice: Either he endorses the painting, likes it and takes it home with him (or puts up in a public place for people to worship), or he insists that, as a child of God, he does not have the right to allow himself to be depicted in such a way, and that the artist must remove the likeness or change it to something less recognizable. (Why am I reluctant to believe this?)
There is a great temptation to make a lot more of this than it deserves, simply because it is just one more distraction commissioned by the current resident to take people’s eyes off the reality of the destruction of the greatness of America. The less we make like Chicken Little and run in circles waving our hands over this crappy attempt to usurp what can’t be taken, the more we are able to keep our eyes on the REAL truth: That this administration is systematically dismantling America from every possible direction, as quickly as it can before it is caught in the act and made to stop. Crucifying “the truth” is only part of the strategy. Stay alert, and don’t let this distract you from WATCHING them.







