There is a lot of noise going around about an “anatomically correct” depiction of Jesus with his arms outstretched. In chocolate, no less. I haven’t seen any pictures of it on the internet, but I’m not interested enough to go looking for any, either. It seems these kinds of attempts at blasphemy seem to take an upswing right around the Christians’ holiest seasons. It’s not enough that these squeaky wheels have managed to have all (Constiutionally guaranteed) public expression of religious faith expunged from the public view. They have to take their contempt that one step further, and try to make as much sport as possible of the holiest things in the Christian faith.
It seems, apparently, that somehow these depictions are supposed to make Christians lose their faith in an all-powerful Creator and run, screaming and tearful, into the arms of the secularists. The other reason for building such a thing might be to show the world just how much the builder does NOT believe: “This is what I think of your God, and all that goes with Him!”
The problem with this kind of “thinking” is that although they think they are striking a telling blow against the forces of superstition and antiquated belief systems, the builders are really only showing the rest of the world how easy it is to scare them into making a stupid move, like trying to mock the Creator. There’s a passage in the Bible that puts it into four words: “God is not mocked.” It means simply that no matter what we puny humans do to show our rebellion, He Who Is is above all of it. Shaking fists at the heavens and calling God names is puny beyond the telling, but for young radicals (I’m just guessing here, but “college student” seems to be the appropriate age group for this kind of silly “protest”), it must seem to them that they have finally made the ultimate gesture of rebellion against God–and all temporal authority while they are at it.
Suffice it to say that childish things like chocolate Christs in revealing poses do very little to turn real Christians away from their faith, but they do go a long way toward showing how infantile and bratty the unbelieving builders of said junk-food junk can be.
Being “shocked” by the construction (somehow, I pictured in my mind a piece of real “art,” but I realize that people of this ilk seldom have the patience with instruction to reach any point of expertise or excellence) is a phony reaction engineered by the lefish press to pretend that the construction had enough merit to actually “shock.” Using the “S” word in regard to this kind of junk is an attempt to give the whatever-it-is more substance than it deserves, and to drum up readership of their yellow rags.
If the chocolate is edible, there might be some redeeming value in the sculpture…just melt it down, provide everybody with long-handled fondue forks and some strawberries, and have to. Otherwise, it would probably be wisest just to ignore the silly thing.










